Let’s review the first initialed prize: Ansari X
This week I read the interview with Thomas Vander Ark, and got to know the X Prize Foundation. Thomas Vander Ark believes prizes can make a big difference; it changed public perception of what is possible. Although prize are a strategy to change perception and policy, he and the X Prize foundation have a very strong bias in favor of entrepreneurial solution, rather than trying to promote regime change, or policy shift.
However, as he said in the article “When it
is not clear how the problem will be solved, a prize mechanism is very useful.”
,it is possible to apply his concept to explore solutions for problems in everyday life. I develop
interest in the prizes that explore solution tacking social problem. According
a NY Times critic: “Maybe such prizes like Ansari X today should take the form
of more modest bounties -- in contests that are likely to produce multiple
winners whose very numbers contribute to solving a problem.” I found the article
about using prize as an incentive to tackle tax fraud.
IRS Rewarding Those Who Snitch On
Tax Cheats
March 4th, 2010
With the
temptation to fudge taxes being greater than ever, the IRS plans to reward
those who are willing to rat out tax cheats. As a part of its informant programs,
the IRS encourages those who suspect someone of committing tax
fraud to report
itfor a handsome reward.
How Does the Program Work?
By blowing the whistle on those who cheat
on taxes, the IRS
usually will give the whistle blower a percentage of the amount that the tax
cheat underpaid. However, since there are two different programs carrying
different percentage amounts, lets take a look at the two:
1.For
small-time crooks: If you want to blow the whistle on a
small-time crook then you would be participating in the original IRS informant
program that has been around for more than 140 years. If you report someone to
this program, you could receive up to 15 percent of the amount that has been
underpaid up to a maximum award of $10 million.
2.For
big-time crooks: On the other hand, if you suspect
someone of cheating the IRS out of at least $2 million (including taxes,
penalties and interest) then you could receive between 15 and 30 percent of
what was underpaid in a new whistle-blower program. The catch with this
program, however, is that the suspected tax evader must be an individual and
his or her gross income must exceed $200,000.
Does The Program Help?
So far, the IRS has reported that in
the fiscal year 2008, 476 informant tips were received identifying 1,246
taxpayers just in the second whistle-blower program. In total, the firm has
received claims from informants that involve billions of dollars in taxes,
penalties and interest.
Its clear that the IRS takes tax
fraud seriously.
However, there are always people ready to try theirunique tax scams,
especially when the economy is suffering. If you want to make a quick buck off
of someone you know who is planning to cheat on taxes this year, you can complete a claim
on the IRS site or call the tip line at
1-800-829-0433.
In my opinion, it is slightly different
using prize model to solve social problems and science and tech challenge, the
concept is powerful but the mechanism needs to be tried, IRS is a good example
using prize as leverage in social sector, it may cause social debate rewarding fraud
money to snitchers, but it is a fairly good start for a traditional public sector.
My question:
In the article, Thomas Vander Ark mentioned
couple of times about applying prize model to inspire entrepreneur in education.
I googled and had a hard time finding any existing prize competition to promote
breakthroughs in education system. Currently is there any? It could be a good
incentive for donors and venture capitalist, since no one has claim the spot
yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.