Reading the last article for this week “From
microfinance Into Microinsurance”, I actually had bad vibes. From finance to
insurance, all the practitioners working in this field have a good intention—make
financial service available to the poor (and make big bucks out of it). But the
status quo is, lots of MFI find micro-finance not as profitable as before, then
they look at each other and do a quick shift to new market—like
micro-insurance. It is perfectly logical to explore a brand-new clientele given
the claim that “both the insurance markets in developed countries and
microfinance markets in developing countries are saturated. “
Nevertheless, have we done enough to refine
the product we have? Do we create customized strategy of a new product to woo the
customer we already have? The way I see the problem, within and without the
article, is we do not know our client enough in the first place. It hardly
occurs to many MFI that business strategy, especially marketing, plays a huge
role in success.
When you check MFI profile online, 99% of the
big-players in the market use joint-liability model, a prevailing model Yunus
created 30 years ago. Marketing strategy is barely mentioned, and everyone reaches
a forced unanimity. Otherwise, how can you justify an everlasting elixir for
all such distinctly different people in India, in South Africa, and in Brazil?
The “joint-liability model” is like “Macdonald”,
may work all over the world. But Macdonald provides spicy wingding in China, “Mac
Veg” in India, Taco in Mexico—Macdonald has billions of sales still they do
market research and make customized change. MFI should conduct more researches;
create messages that work for the target market, and design training for the
customer if necessary, rather than jumping around get into another market they
are unfamiliar with.
I am in a Tepper student club and currently
working on micro-insurance project for a MFI called “VEG”, in Ghana. Through
tons of online research, talking to client and people from Ghana, we are
staring to build a plausible marketing strategy. It composes of “message”, “medium”,
“training”, and “budget”. If we do not reach out to survey the client, it would
never occur to me after-death expense and education opportunity for children is
the major concern among the target group (young mothers), and we will choose to
sell credit life policy (a wrong product that does not meet the client need),
instead of group life insurance policy. What I am trying to say is, a
successful product is based on knowing your customer, and then you find a
suitable way of selling it—which most MFI overlook.
The article talks lot about “micro insurance
is the NEXT FRONTIER”,”HIGH GROWTH POTENTIAL”, just like 2006 when Muhammad Yunus
won the Nobel Peace glory, thousands of hundreds of paper portrayed
microfinance “the grand new future for the poor” ,”hope to transformation”. I am deeply worried this is just the beginning
of an unnecessary market shift, which many MFIs roll into micro-finance,
without knowing that standing where they are, they could do much better by just
knowing more about their client.
My only question is, is the marking strategy we use (“message”, “medium”, “training”, and “budget”) missing sth big? as there's no formalized pattern or tons of case study from business.
My only question is, is the marking strategy we use (“message”, “medium”, “training”, and “budget”) missing sth big? as there's no formalized pattern or tons of case study from business.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.