Social innovation in the 21st Century is finding
itself located between two conflicting forces.
On the one hand, Western-style democratic capitalism leads
almost invariably to greater income inequality. This is partially due to the
fact that political power is typically concentrated in the hands of the
wealthy, who modify the rules of the game to enhance their economic position. As
an example, take the U.S. tax system, which is dramatically less progressive
than it was 50 years ago.
On the other hand, social innovation, as we’ve read about
and discussed in this class, is often geared toward the bottom of economic
pyramid, whether the innovation is in the realm of microfinance, mobile phones,
or health care. The fruits of social innovation are lifting millions of people
out of dire poverty.
Given these two competing forces, it will be interesting to
see whether social innovation can succeed in narrowing income inequality.
This, I predict, will play out in the form of political
turmoil. As people at the bottom of the pyramid achieve greater economic
capacity – not to mention better health – they will demand better political
representation. In fact, the same mobile-phone or smart-phone technology that
is improving people’s economic lives can also be used for political organizing.
The real dream of a better future for humanity is rooted in
social innovation that improves both the financial status and the political
status of the previously disenfranchised masses.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.