I find this interesting because of two things: are we doing
this because of our new focus on quality of life and realism, and what will the
future look like if we progress at the rate we are going now?
The articles reiterate the message of “know your audience”. Whether it’s socio-economic factors,
cultures, political atmospheres, or religious beliefs, you need to know the
real lives of your consumers regardless of whether you are selling a Bentley or
a Tata. In developed countries, we see a
trend of desiring reality (like organic groceries or reality TV) and the rising
need for businesses to be profitable, but also “be good stewards of the
environment and society” (Alboher).
Fifty years ago, the United States was all about efficiency, even to the
point of removing the human factor whatsoever.
People were more interested in making money over a long period of time
and less about whether or not they actually liked the job. This paradigm has shifted, and with it comes
social responsibility. We want to enjoy
our lives, and a big piece of that has manifested in helping to better the
lives of others. The efficiency of our
past comes together with this new perspective and has created the culture of
social innovation – even if it still has a profit-driven structure. One key idea I read was in the words of
Danone manager Faber, that the company strives for “satisfactory and durable
profits, but not to maximize profits.”
This never would have come to fruition fifty years ago, when efficiency
was the main driver of motivation.
As for the future, I can only speculate with my small sample
of experience. It seems that the
developed world’s shift to realism has identified developing countries as a ‘real’
and tangible presence to apply our refined efficiency and aligns with our goals
of enjoying our own lives. However, as
other countries benefit from our efficiency, how much forward can we move? What long-term impact will most of these
products have for the people in the developing countries? While I have only respect for companies and
organizations who are contributing to solving the most pressing problems of the
developing worlds – what are the long-term benefits or solutions? Once a population has clean water and fair
market prices because of text-message information, where do we go from
there? Is there a way we can help these
communities become self-sufficient, to be able to address these problems
themselves in the future? Or, as we see
in our current conflicts in the middle-east, is this something we should even
have a hand in? I have no argument
against solving immediate, crucial needs, but how can we really improve their ‘quality
of life’ for generations to come?
Clearly I have no answers to these questions, but this
evolution of cultures and social ventures has seen an exponential acceleration of
changing business models and practices, applicability of efficiency and technology,
and the impact of developed on developing countries. I hope to see it be sustainable and to be
able to one day raise all people to the same or similar qualities of life, but
only time will tell.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.