Traditionally we think that Not-profits organizations don’t
make money at all, because financial revenue is not the reason why they exist,
instead social mission shapes all their operations and implementations
including the very motivation why they are founded. At the
same time, for there are investment organizations, foundations, government
funds, philanthropies and other social mission-oridented investment camp willing
to donate money to traditional non-profits, they do actually don’t need to
concern about financial issue.
However, both investers and nonprifts are looking for more
efficient and effective way to fulfill their social mission—to do good for
people and community. When they “spy”into business world, they are inspired by
a basic principle that guides and motivates the entire economy empire to move
forward. It is the model of supply demand and exchange, from where the value is
generated and evaluated, that creates a sustainable value-generating model.
It’s a huge breakthrough to combine business philosophy with
social mission-driven methodology. We can fortell the enormous potentials this
integrated path, we call it social enterprise, has. Neverthe less, any pyramid
has to have a base, a solid one, otherwise, the approach to the top will only
move towards failure and collapse. Besides the governmental policy and
regulations, without doubt, the financial sufficiency is the foundamental
factor that a social enterprise can survive, thrive, better off people’s life
within the community it serves. When it comes fundraising of social enterprise
domain, like The Fund Gap has talked
about, it comes to be troublesome, because social enterprise combine both charastics
from business and social aspects. This causes the concern from both traditional
social investment and traditional business investors. As a business investor
inputing money to a social enterprise, I may shoulder the possibility the
benefits will be compromised by social output. Vice versa, as a social-driven
investor, I may worry the outcome beneficial to the society as a whole can be
discounted under the business enbeding within social enterprise. So the
enterprise may end up getting money from both sides or getting none (getting
discounted amount of money for both sides).
To minimize the problem social enterprises may encounter, to
increase the effectiveness of fundraising, there is one value should be clearly
addressed in a society, which is the understanding and census of social value. Even
though it’s widely believed that any party of an entire exchange chain has to
be satisfied so that this kind of exchange can be sustainable, there is not be
a one-fits-all senario being able to making every party satisfied at the same
level. So a willing compromise has to be made, which is heavily dependent on
the understanding of social value. For instance, Nestle is a big water-
consumer company, it pumps water that belongs to every one in this world to
make it its own to bottle it and to sell it in the market at a price that some
extremely poor people in certain area couldn’t afford. If now a business-driven
investor is going to invest some money for Nestle’s Water for All Action—a social enterprise like indepent organization
also led by Nestle(I made this up.), instead of hoping for Nestle can generate
more revenue in a short term, the expectation of the investment should be
assisting Nestle to be more environmentally friendly so that this company can
still be accept by people in a long run when water issue is becoming more and
more vexing. Vise versa, instead of
denying this action based on the doubtness to Nestle, a social foundation
should evaluate how this action can efficiently implement the good deeds and
how well it can bring change to the society and then decide whether donate
money to it or not. As a outsider of the flip side of our own, we don’t
scrutinize the motivation for investors on the other side to reach a promising
outcome to the society, they are allowed to have their own concern and
diplomacy, but as long as they are aware of social influence and social value
of any money decision they make, they will bring goodness to this world and be
satisfied at the time. It’s a bonus from the society that has been testified
thousdands of millions of times: The more you cherish the social value, the
more likely you will be valued by social improvements, the more you will
actually get in the end.
Besides dealing with traditional social and business
investors, social enterprise also need to utilize the public resources,
including government funds and private resources from the common people, like
social impact bond mentioned in the reading materials. Under the fierce as well
as promising situation, social enterprise should really stratigically balance
different aspects in this economy that is becoming more and more social-driven.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.