This weeks
readings give an insight in the emerging innovations targeting the less income
groups which not only help the poor segments of the society but also earn some
reasonable profit for the companies. The questions that come to my mind after
reading all the articles is whether such ventures are ethical and self sustainable.
By ethical I mean that by earning certain amount of profit from the new social
innovations like the low cost yogurt, shoes etc are we doing philanthropic work
or business? And what if in the future the cost of yogurt goes up and some
people might be so fond of it that they will still buy it at a higher price. Secondly
is such a venture sustainable in the long run? For instance in the case of
Danone the income levels of the target population might increase or decrease
depending on the economy of the countries hence affecting the demand for the
product.
This reminds
me of a venture initiated by the Government of Punjab Province of Pakistan
called “cheap Pita Bread” the aim of
this scheme was to provide subsidized flour to the private bread vendors who
will produce Pita bread without earning
any profit and in addition they would also produce normal pita breads at the
market price and earn some profit. The cost of normal Pita Bread is around 6 cents and the price of
the subsidized bread was 2 cents. The aim of the scheme was to benefit the poor
segments of the society who could barely earn two meals a day. The scheme
remained in force for almost a year in which the Government had to pay a huge
amount as subsidies to the bread vendors and ultimately it had to be discontinued.
The main reasons for the failure of this venture were misuse of the subsidized floor by the vendors
and selling pita bread at market price instead of the reduced price. There was
lack of accountability of the vendors because of the limited resources of the Government.
Moreover, the middle class who could otherwise afford to purchase normal Pita
Bread also started purchasing the cheaper bread due to its low cost. This negated
the aim of the government to target only the poorer segments of the society.
From ethical perspective it might seem that providing cheap bread was helping
the poor but contrary to that prices of other related goods like, vegetables,
lentils etc were extremely high. Therefore just providing cheap bread was not
solving the long term problems of the poor segments of the society.
Similarly if
we look at the Danone project of 10 cent yogurt, it might be providing some
form of a snack to the people but in essence it does not solve the real problem
of malnutrition and hunger in Africa. Isn’t it just offering them peanuts and
making profit by providing a product to a large number of people. Do we have an
ethical issue here?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.