Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Thinking Socially, Locally

One of my most vivid experiences with poverty stems from a childhood experience in India, where I saw families and kids in tattered clothing and bare feet pushing and pulling themselves through the small town my parents are from.

As a child, I related most to the poverty-stricken children I saw.  Our servant’s daughter, would help serve me and looked after me, moving through her arduous tasks with such ease while I stayed in a cool room watching TV.  Her relaxed and dutiful approach towards her task inadvertently agonized me.  Why was she responsible for such work?  Couldn’t she play with me?  Could we get her shoes?
These are the kinds of questions I would present my family with.  And they explained some permutation--whether it be the caste system or another excuse--that justified her role.  I would often think about ways to help her, and other girls like her.  But as a child in the early 80's, I was at a very nascent point of my understanding of how to do well by doing good.  And, survive off of it!

Generation after generation, a vast majority of Indian families are employed by other Indian families in the role of servants.  It has been a continuous cycle out of acceptance that there is no way to break out of that cycle.  Year after year, visit after visit, I return to the US only to arrive at the same point: something has to change. The Economist article “Let’s hear those ideas” was especially interesting to me because it brought to light the disparity among communities, not just in the developing world.  I always attached poverty to India because that was my initial introduction; however, I see that efforts, even at the federal level here in the US, are aiming to help deliver solutions towards social issues.  Most of these issues appear to stem from funding and the limited resources within the public sector can make it challenging to deliver a holistic solution – they are addressing the symptom, rather than the illness.  The “social innovation” approach has identified a way to create public-private partnerships that will help transform the way public services are provided.

What the social entrepreneurs have identified is a way to re-invest in people and communities that may have experienced some sort of disinvestment.  Whether it be through education like Wendy Kopp or through micro finance like Muhammad Yunus, they have found a way to address an issue that can ultimately help break the cycle that I’ve grown all too familiar with through my India visits.

As these social ventures are created and begin to become scalable models, I also hope the psychology of the poor also shifts and empowers them to uplift themselves.  I recently read “Escaping the Cycle of Scarcity” where an economist and a psychologist propose a way to explain why the poor are less future-oriented than those with more money.  This article made me consider another segment of the poverty-stricken population: what about those professionals who complete graduate school, have large loans as a result of their academic investment and have yet to secure a steady income?  They make similar decisions based on a limited band-with too. 



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.