In all that we’ve learned during the past 7 weeks, I feel
that something is missing. We’ve learned
about innovative products and strategies geared mainly toward the international
market. I’ve been inspired by the
audacity of these ideas and the determination of the individuals who’ve created
them. However, there is considerable
work to do to make organizations, systems, and products that already exist more effective.
Using the United States as an example, we have some of the
most elite innovators in the world.
We’ve developed devices like the IPhone that seem to have put the world
in the palm of our hand. Yet and still,
our government is slow to act and cannot reach agreement on most policy issues. Our country spends money that we don’t have
and our people can’t find jobs. Our kids
don’t have access to equal educational opportunities and our schools are
failing. Yet and still taxpayer dollars
continue to fund these traditional public schools despite a decline in student
enrollment and student outcomes.
Why don’t we put our energy and innovative efforts into
making changes to these flawed infrastructures?
Why don’t we make the things that we’ve worked so hard and paid so much
for, more efficient, faster, and more inspiring? Why don’t we see the possibilities instead of
the limitations? Yes, there are barriers
to innovating from within an existing organization (e.g.: bureaucracy) but so
what! Fix them, change them, and allow
room for progress.
This week’s Harvard
Business Review Article talked about crafting innovations to fit unmet
needs at the “bottom of the pyramid”.
It’s somewhat “sexy” to focus on these international markets but it’s
not where we should put 100% of our efforts.
Instead, we should adapt the best practices from these innovations to
existing infrastructures and focus a significant portion of our efforts there. Take the new business model process for
emerging markets from the Harvard Review
Article for example. We can adapt these strategies to the business
model of existing organizations – ensuring that they meet an unmet need, make smart
tradeoffs to drive down costs where appropriate, make products accessible,
etc.
In all that we’ve learned, we must remember the necessity to
innovate from within and from without.
If we can approach social innovation with this more balanced approach, I
believe we will begin to see positive changes to scale inside and outside of
the US.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.