While searching on the internet, I ran into an article
by Bill Shore (the founder and CEO of Share Our
Strength), Darell Hammond (the founder and CEO of KaBOOM!) and Amy Celep (the president and CEO of Community
Wealth Partners) in the Stanford Social Innovation Review Magazine which might
give an insight on what motivates social foundations, how they work and how
they succeed in tackling social problems. (http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/when_good_is_not_good_enough)
The article is about two successful non-profit
US organizations that are trying to deal with: hunger
and lack of opportunity to play. How their founders were inspired, what they
targeted at and what they did better than other similar non-profit
organizations are touched upon.
Share Our Strength is tackling with hunger whereas
KaBOOM! is struggling with the lack of opportunities to play. Unlike other non-profit foundations, they focused on the
underlying set of problems rather than the symptom. They looked beyond
short-term achievements and focused on long-term outcomes that will ultimately
solve social problems.
Inspired by the news about thousands of
Ethiopians expected to die soon from famine that was on the Washington Post,
Bill Shore founded Share Our Strength in 1984. Share Our Strength has raised
and invested more than $376 million. Much of the focus was on the entrepreneurial
ways to generate funds rather than on how it used the funds to advance its
mission.
Similarly, KaBOOM! was founded in 1995,
when Darell Hammond came into a story about two children who suffocated while
playing in a car because they didn’t have anywhere else to play in The Washington Post. They
focused on building, improving, and opening playgrounds by mobilizing
communities and engaging the corporate sector to fund and volunteer to support
the work.
Despite the novelty and
satisfaction of the organizational growth, Share Our Strength and
KaBOOM!’s efforts were reaching only a fraction of
those in need. Later on, they delved deeper into the problems and succeeded
in tackling these problems.
Share Our
Strength designed and lead a national campaign called
“No Kid Hungry”. The campaign suggested that kids are not hungry because of a
lack of food or effective programs, but because they lack access to nutrition programs
such as school breakfasts and food stamps. So, their focus became helping kids
in need access to these programs. Gaining confidence from their stakeholders, they
attracted more investment which helped them add children in need to public
nutrition programs.
At KaBOOM! the story was similar. Despite its growth, they weren’t solving the problem
completely. KaBOOM! initially only built more places for kids to play; but the
important thing is how society values and engages in play. Many playgrounds are
empty most of the time, active play is disappearing in America, kids are
spending more than eight hours a day in front of a screen. Afterwards, what makes
KaBOOM! more successful is addressing the complexity of the issue by creating
transformational change. They developed new strategies to inspire the
importance of play in kids’ live. For example, they are launching a new
initiative that will reward individuals taking action to make their communities
more playful.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.