This week’s social innovation topic is “The Future of Social
Innovation and Enterprise.” With the Fastcompany article titled “Forget GDP:
The Social Progress Index Measures National Well-Being”[1],
we learn how the nonprofit Social Progress Imperative is putting forth an index
that measures more than economic output, but the well-being of a society by
observing a number of social and environmental factors.
As many social scientists would
argue, GDP may simply be too one-dimensional, whereas the SPI may provide both
social scientists and economists with a more complete measure of a nation’s
progress. Given that strong economic growth does not necessarily translate into
a nation’s overall well-being, the governments of the BRIC countries as well as
those emerging from the Arab Spring could potentially benefit from adopting the
SPI. With the adoption of a more intuitive measure, governments and innovators
may be able to better understand where societal issues are originating and
where collaboration to fight societal problems can occur.
With Megha Bahree’s article “GE
Remodels Businesses in India”[2]
and Dan Baum’s “Inside The World’s Most Ambitious Eco-City” we see two great
examples of how organizations and governments are presenting sustainable future
innovations. In the case of GE, the global organization has adopted a
perspective that is specific to the needs and expectations of a society. GE has
been in Indian for a number of years, but only recently have they fully begun
to understand how they could become more of a societal force than providing
healthcare supplies.
The future of social innovation
presents a number of exciting opportunities, models, and new individual roles.
The role of a social intrapreneur, for example, or an individual with an
organization that find creative ways to become change agents that pursue social
agendas is particularly interesting to me. While these individuals may
historically be seen as troublemakers within the corporate hierarchy, major
changes in the corporate landscape are encouraging the emergence of
intrapreneurs. Corporate organizational structures, for instance, are becoming
more transparent, while organizations are also placing more emphasis on
corporate social responsibility, leadership programs for young associates and middle
managers, and continuing education. This changing ecosystem are encouraging
intrapreneurs to break through the corporate politics and pitch their
environmentally-conscious and social impact ideas directly to the customer.
This new
individual role within an organization aligns well with more general shifts in
how the millennial generation views the workplace. More than ever, today’s
workers tie their personal values, passions, and ambitions more closely to
their work than previous generations, providing a unique opportunity for employers.
As large U.S. corporations and multinational organizations have a larger role
in shaping corporate diplomacy and understand the needs of new consumer
markets, do you think intrapreneurs are becoming an important asset to these
organizations? Do you think intrapreneurs can have as great a social impact
within an organization and social entrepreneurs have working on their own or
with non-profits? What kind of person becomes an intrapreneur? In many ways, I
feel the Heinz College prepares us for exactly this role.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.