It was heartening to the read the methods employed by Bolsa
Familia and Opurtunidades in Brazil and Mexico respectively. I was particularly impressed by the work done
with regards to how the monthly payments translated into better levels of
education. I would like to use this blog to highlight a similar initiative in
Pakistan, with the only difference being that its primary aim is to improve
education levels directly. The program is aptly titled “Paid to Learn” and is
run under the auspices of the Zindagi Trust, a nonprofit welfare organization.
The project is the brainchild of Pakistani pop star Shehzad Roy.
The program works by paying every child a set rate of around
Rs. 20 every day. In return the children
have to attend school regularly and submit homework on time. Any indiscipline
with regard to behavior or tardiness results in the payment for the day being
held back. The program specifically targets primary education for children who
are working in the slums of Pakistan. The program rewards the top students of
the program with a scholarship for continuing education. The idea is to
substitute child labor with education. The curriculum is based on an
accelerated program with an emphasis on math, science, social sciences, English
and Urdu.
Parents are contacted and their permission is sought before
enrolling any children in the program as in Pakistan the biggest proponents of
child labor are the parents themselves. The parents normally have large
families of up to six children all with only a few years age difference between
the kids themselves. This means that the eldest child has to “grow up” very
quickly to aid with the household income and can be earning on the streets as
quick as his/her eighth birthday. The “Paid to Learn” program promises a fixed
income and the hope of a better future through education but to the concerned
parents the current income normally matters much more than future prospects. The
program has up to 2800 children in it at one time out of which at least a 1000
graduate each year. More information can be found at http://www.zindagitrust.org/index.php.
In Mexico and Brazil poverty as a whole has been scaled back
by targeting purchasing power directly, with better education as a spillover.
It seems however though that this approach has been more successful than the
ZIndagi Trust in Pakistan even though over here the sole target is better
education. The basic difference it seems to be is funding; in Pakistan the work
is being done on a non-profit basis and is heavily reliant on donors whereas in
the Latin American countries the program has government support. The question
is, if both programs had government support or rather the same endowment, then
which one would have more of a benefit to society? The program that targets better
education directly or as an after effect?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.