Hugh Whalan, who is known as a Destination Entrepreneur, has
traveled and started startups all over the world, but is currently serving at
the CEO for Persistent
Energy Ghana (PEG). PEG Ghana currently sells Pay As You Go solar
energy products to Ghanaian people who live off the grid without access to
electricity.
When researching Whalan through various articles and videos
including this Forbes
video, I was a little turned off from him at first. When discussing how to
start an international startup he said, “travel to the places you’re interested
and soak up the culture, atmospheres, and see business opportunities. It [the startup]
can be done inexpensively and there isn’t a lot of competition.” This reminded
me of a very privileged mentality—not everyone has the privilege to travel and
it he seemed very nonchalant about entering into a non-competitive market and
making the most of it.
When I read Whalan’s piece How
Misinformed Ideas About Profit Are Holding Back the World's Poor he wrote
for Fast Company, Whalan received three questions/criticism while working with
the people of Ghana. He was told:
- How can you make money
working with the poor
- Aren’t you taking
advantage of the poor by making a profit?
- “Wouldn’t charity do a better job
of meeting their needs?” (verbatim from article)
If I would have read this article two weeks ago or just ignored it
because of my first impression of Whalen, I would have asked the same
questions, especially the third question. Before this course, I was a
huge believer in charity: sending clothes abroad, making quilts, raising funds,
but last week in class, it changed my mind to an extent.
Watching the video with
the MoneyMaker's co-founder, Martin Fisher, made me realize that charity can
take away worth of something. Fisher
told viewers that when he gave away the MoneyMaker (under a different name),
nobody used them, but when the company changed the marketing and sold them
(going from social to business venture), the product took off. When a person in
poverty makes the financial decision to purchase something that will benefit
his or her income that is huge. There is a personal responsibility invested
now.
Whalan brings up an
excellent point in this article about selling items to people in poverty. One specific point that I found interesting
was how he said, “status quo for poor consumers is that they routinely pay a
lot more for products and services than anyone else. This is something known as
the poverty penalty.” The poverty
penalty which was coined by C.K. Prahalad in the book, The Fortune at the
Bottom of the Pyramid, describes how the poor people pay more for everything
than the rich do, and this is a global trend. When people like Whalan are aware
of social and economic norms towards people in poverty is when the trend will
begin to change.
I still believe in
giving to charity, but Whalan and Martin Fisher are two people (there are more,
including Ingrid Munro who Whalan quoted) are beginning to change the way the
world looks at people in poverty. When the world begins to shift in how the
poor are viewed, that is when we will be able to begin to empower those
individuals and bring them out of poverty.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.