Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Social-Impact Bonds: Spurring Innovative Uses

Mr. Jim Clifford is a partner at Baker Tilly, an accountancy firm in Britain, and a father to nine adopted children.  The adoption process in Britain is failing in his eyes.  The children have only a short window to be placed in a family and if they are not placed by local authorities, then move on to the national adoption register.  Working alongside the Consortium of Voluntary Adoption Agencies, the two organizations will support the incorporation of a social-impact bond (SIB) to alleviate the issues provided by the Britain adoption process.  The fund will be called “It’s All About Me,” and will provide children with the means to seek out parents.  This SIB was added on July 17th this year, is expected to raise $3 million from Bridges Ventures and Big Society Capital – pools of social-investment capital.

One of 18 voluntary adoption agencies will be commissioned by local authorities in Britain to assist children in seeking out families.  The funds will be used to pay for a variety of functions to support adoptive parents.  The process for payout has specific milestones that must be reached.  

In order for the program to receive payment, four areas must be completed:
  1. Child registration into the program
  2. Placement with a new family
  3. First year anniversary of placement
  4. Second year anniversary of placement

Benefits to the adoption agencies: This program will cost $85,544 per child, which is still a cost saving of a little less than half for the adoption agencies if they were not able to place the foster child.

Benefits to investors: Investors should be earning an annual interest of 4% and repayment of their capital after ten years                                                                                                                                                           
Will this work?  This concept is new and still requires trial and error before it will allow for smooth transitions, effective implementation by the agencies, and to provide promised benefits to investors.  This particular SIB was designed so that in the case that anything did not work out the way that it was planned, agencies would feel the bulk of the burden.  Although there is the possibility of this failing, the continuous merging of the non-profit sector with an investment model provides government organizations with a new channel to support their missions.  This may not be an immediate success, but the integration of this hybrid model is providing a promising future for existing organizations working to further their social causes.

What are the ways that the use of SIBs can guarantee profits for investors?
Do SIBs provide an advantage for social ventures and non-profit organizations?


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.