Impact investing has been getting more and more attention in
a context where the urge of finding alternative solutions to dealing with social
problems has become pressing. Governments have a crucial role to
play in facilitating this dynamic as they can create a friendly environment
where resources can be more easily linked to needs and where impact can be better
monitored. Impact investing could grow even more exponentially if the
conversation is taken beyond the national level to the global scene where a
common language and assessment tools would help expand the reach of such
initiatives. But how feasible is that?
Indeed, in the past decades, the public sector has been
rethinking the models through which it delivers public goods. For instance,
public-private partnerships (PPP) have been gaining momentum as it has been
proven that collaborative efforts between the public sector and the private
sector are often far more efficient than what each one can do separately. In
the same vein, another emerging model is also taking-off where the private sector
simply takes over the responsibility of managing basic necessities. This can
take many forms such us social ventures focusing on delivering social impact or
large companies dedicating a portion of their revenues to impact investing. Recently,
new innovative ideas like social bonds – a contract with the public sector in
which a commitment is made to pay for improved social outcomes that result in
public sector savings1- have also started to appear, which paves the
way to new win-win partnership models for the public good. The public sector
has everything to gain in being the catalyst triggering the growth of these new
models as it would help decrease its direct intervention in managing
complicated social issues while increasing efficiency. To do so successfully, it
should initiate and build a comprehensive ecosystem around social innovation and
facilitate the creation of formal networks of organizations who can help
supervise and boost this ecosystem.
But what if we could go beyond the national level and were
able to implement a global scheme that would propel impact investing? Indeed, speaking
a common language and using the same assessment tools would probably facilitate
collaboration around this topic and enable a globalization of access to funding
and resources. Think about the carbon credits model. If we could build something
similar, say “social credits”, which
can be circulated and marketed around the world, more money and efforts can be
transferred towards social initiatives and research. The social footprint is
becoming more and more important to companies which are increasing their social
responsibility investments but it could become even more important if there is
a formal market and quantifiable benefits to it. However, the biggest hurdle in
this case is how to uniformly measure the impact generated and give it a
precise numeric value that could serve as a market price. Indeed, in the case
of carbon credits, a ton of CO2 can be easily quantified but the impact of a
social endeavor may not be as easy to measure because of the nature of its
value. Could it be broken down to numbers? It has been done with some abstract
notions like governance or happiness. Or should we create new global organizations
like social impact auditing firms, or global rating agencies, or even a market
index? This would add a qualitative assessment to quantitative measures which
would result in a more complete review and assessment. The implementation of
such a global measure seems very complicated but, in my opinion, the discussion
around social innovation is now mature enough to start having this discussion. What
do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.